(1) In "Deus ex Machina: Tradition, Technology, and the Chicanafuturist Art of Marion C. Martinez" Ramirez defines Chicanafuturism as "Chicano cultural production that attends to cultural transformations resulting from new and everyday technologies" (77). Ramirez argues that this requires redefining the human. How can humans be defined in a less fractured and hierarchical way? Who should lead this redefining process?
(2) In "Afrofuturism/Chicanafuturism: Fictive Kin," Ramirez writes "Instead of applauding science and technology or condemning them
altogether, Martinez’s work shows how they have transformed Native
American and Hispanic life and culture—and how one self-described
“Indio-Hispanic” woman has transformed some of the tools of science
and technology" (188). Both science and technology can be thought of fields that produce hegemonic knowledge used to exclude or objectify racialized peoples. How does Chicanafuturism make technology liberatory?
(3) Search engines can create dissonance between the knowledge we seek and the knowledge privileged by hegemonic forces. Noble argues that "As the search arena is consolidated to a handful of corporations,
it’s even more crucial to pay close attention to the types of biases that are
shaping the information prioritized in search engines" (41). How does the ability of corporations to shape the information we are exposed to link to other Neoliberal practices? How does biased information create a foundation for further violence?
No comments:
Post a Comment